cancer81 wrote:Thread source: 'Rating downgrade - beginning of the end, hyperinflation next'
fiscal prudence for the american administration?
not doing quantitative easing?
raising funds by actually raising taxes and collecting revenue?
promises are almost "meant" to be broken.
anihow, even the MOST conservative would not think up a plan like that. They would rather attempt to sanction other nations in a bid to bring back American Jobs for the American People.
Originally Posted by sock_min
Source Thread: [ST forum]: CPF min sum amount vs Inflation: the 3 letters thus far What does CPF have in relation to a shiny head children in Zimbawe??? I doubt even USA fed chairman can influence CPF. |
cancer81 wrote:Source Thread: 'Rating downgrade - beginning of the end, hyperinflation next'
how about some comments from you instead? to kick this off?
hey ForeverAlone!!
this guy!! this is the guy, you need to talk to!!
ponpokku (13June2012) wrote:Re thread: [Ferrari accident] Should assets of Ma Chi be frozen immediately for (re-)compensation?
obviously u dun drive and u dun read and u dun think, after i point out that insurance clauses to u.
what u said only applies to those that are WITHIN the insurance policies.
in cases of accidents where the insured was found to be non-compliance with the insurance conditions, the insurance company can void his policy on the spot and return him the premiums (usually much later on). meaning 'i dun do ur business and here's ur money, now fark-off'. end of story. u cant read the part that says 'will not pay'? now go ask ard drivers how many of them kena such things from insurance companies. u think or u try to portray insurance companies as dumb suckers that will pay out every single cent at the very first hour? ppl are in the business longer than ur father mother lived and they are famous for being cunning business. they know what to do, plz.
My Little Diary 88 (13June2012) wrote:
Re Thread: [Ferrari accident] Should assets of Ma Chi be frozen immediately for (re-)compensation?
cherry6,
perhaps the government should not step in but rather the traffic police should quickly conclude its case so that a civil claim can proceed on two legs
in the civil claim, to request the Court to freeze the assets of the estate until such time the Court make a judgment. Also to serve notice to the administrator of the estate that a civil claim is being filed and that as administrator, she should not distribute the funds until the claim is settled
however, like you said, it is possible for the funds to be sent abroad, the administrator returned to China and then there is no way to recover the funds as a civil case cannot request extradition of the administrator
ponpokku (13June2012) wrote:Re Thread: [Ferrari accident] Should assets of Ma Chi be frozen immediately for (re-)compensation?
it means TS too free. thats all.
i dont think our court of law can trial a man who died in the course of his unlawful act, unlike one who incurred debts at an earlier time and died later on. so there will be no blame, meaning he got no outstanding debts to repay, and the successor(s) to his property got zero liabilities to anyone. in the case of an earlier debt, generally speaking the benificiary can either choose to agree to inherit the properties along with the debts, or choose not to accept both. but of cos different places got different laws, might not always be the case.
so it is up to ma chi's family to decide whether or not to compensate the victims. and there's no obligations wadsoever on their side, just out of moral considerations.
- [emphasis added]
ponpokku (12Jun2012) wrote:Thread: '[Ferrari accident] Should assets of Ma Chi be frozen immediately for (re-)compensation?
thats why i say u too free. until that happens we shall see how it will end. what for u hype it all up here to provide fuel for the said 'road terrorist'?
u can try to imagine any remote scenario and try to prophesize on how things will develope, but until that happens, i dun see the relevance of it. all these speculations turns pale in the face of reality.
wallacetan(11-05-2012) wrote:Thread Topic: Property in Singapore taxed less than food and water...why?
For the record, I do not support any polictical party.
I have explained that the Government ROBBED from tax-payers, enrich themselves first, then redistribute the leftover tax-dollars to the 'poor'. Similar to NKF's T. T. Durai.
wallacetan(11-05-2012, 12:45 PM) wrote:Thread topic: Property in Singapore taxed less than food and water...why?
From your logic, if you purchase and own a piece of land, with only grass growing and nothing else. You don't have to pay the increased property tax (a consumption tax)?
Only when you develop the piece of land, like build a luxurious house, swimming pool, tennis courts, gymnasiums, parking lots and private pier with your own money, then you will be punished and have to pay the increased property tax (a consumption tax).
When you paid for the land and build the luxurious house, pool, etc. you have already paid GST to the building company.
Originally Posted by InfinityFrost
Thread topic: Is religion a mental illness? I'm not sure if I necessarily agree that a man without faith is like a Ferrari without direction. Could you perhaps explain a little further? |
