Mandatory Give Way to Buses Scheme
Does Mr Lui Tuck Yew think that he can really amend the law to suit his convenience as Minister of Transport?
[Source: OneMotoring: 'Mandatory Give Way to Buses Scheme'']
[Source: She claims she's a "victim" of new give-way-to-bus rule]
Yes, public transport (buses) is Singapore are slow and sucks "Mrs Teo said bus speeds have gone down from 19.1kmh in 2007 to 17.8kmh, as ridership went up from 2.9 million per day to 3.45 million per day in the same time." ['Bus hubs currently the priority and good progress made: Josephine Teo': (TDY18Jan2012)], and in fact, transport by bicycle for journeys 30km and up might average 25.750kmh. [source: 'road-bike.co.uk']
Rather than the drawing up of more bus lanes, it seems that the MOT is getting lazy and thus enacting some confusing stop gap measures like the ridiculous mandatory Give Way to Buses Scheme (GWTBS)- a scheme whose logic if not legality remains both contradictory if not perplexing. It is in fact perhaps oxymoronic that the good Minister now says that the slow speed of buses exiting bus is due to the fast and continuous movement of other vehicular traffic on Singapore roads, since in stationary traffic conditions yellow boxes to provide for 'reserved' space so that exiting buses ALWAYS have right of way. [Dunearn-Newton Rd- bus bay with typical yellow box pict].
Wouldn't the provision of better public transport services cause fewer Singaporeans to need to travel by taxi or private car?- a largely carbon intense mode of personal transportation.
Isn't the revolving door [wiki] effect of buses entering bus bays the occasion for buses to exit just the same since a bus awaiting entry to a bus bay effectively blocks off all oncoming traffic by virtue of its size? (that is if Minister Lui is adamant about saving bus-lanes painting costs).
Mr Lui used to be a Rear Admiral in the navy, with a large cannon in front and torpedoes beneath, everyone gave way to the Admiral's ship. But road vehicular traffic is not the same, emergency vehicles get stuck in traffic jams just the same- nobody moves. Everyone needs space on the little land designated for road use: bus lanes besides allowing cyclist free passage (cycling is good for exercise (save govt healthcare costs) and good for the environment (low impact on global warming)) also allow emergency public vehicles free passage to conduct to their rightful roles, even during the heaviest traffic periods on all days. Emergency public vehicles stuck in jams remain a stain upon the efficiency that the PAP boasts its credentials by.
The start stop driving by vehicles on the left lane caused by ambiguity as to whether a bus is indeed leaving the bus bay is also another cause for accidents occurring, if not a compromise in time and energy efficiency as drivers operate their brakes with unnecessary intensity. This adds to pollution if not frustration of driving on Singapore roads; foreign talents holding international driving licenses also cannot be expected to understand this paradoxical local law as it is international convention for vehicles along minor roads (bays etc) to give way to vehicles along major roads (e.g. trunk roads): wouldn't an accident due to this legal paradox result in more jams created by unnecessary traffic accidents?
One side issue would be that the Minister is being unnecessary cruel to cyclist and motorcyclist in the enaction of the GWTBS law is that the poor rider/ pillion is then expected to breath in the diesel fumes of the exiting bus: not a pleasant experience nor a safe one- considering that the car driver behind might not be able to break in time, having not considered about the need to stop to give way to the exiting bus and result in the poor rider being crushed in-between- another tragic road fatality.
Mr Lui's salary is one that mirrors the elite of the elite in Singapore [pict]. Surely being elite is not about just making more money? Don't the people of Singapore demand more than just hare brained stop gap measures in managing public transport and road use in hyper-efficient Singapore?
Not everybody can afford a maid [pict link], nor the privilege of private transportation in Singapore [Saw Phiak Hua empress pict].
More for public transport, more for bicycles... Good Minister, Thank you and have a nice day.
References:
Above: Dunearn-Newton Rd bus bay- yellow box pict.
[pict source: Singapore's defense burden - Something no maid can carry]
[pict source]
STOMP 29Aug09: “I gave way to bus -- and got rammed from behind”, [link]
STOMP 19Aug09: “I am one of many 'victims' unfairly fined $130 under new 'give way to bus' rule ”, [link]
[link]
[img source]
Does Mr Lui Tuck Yew think that he can really amend the law to suit his convenience as Minister of Transport?
[Source: OneMotoring: 'Mandatory Give Way to Buses Scheme''][Source: She claims she's a "victim" of new give-way-to-bus rule]Yes, public transport (buses) is Singapore are slow and sucks "Mrs Teo said bus speeds have gone down from 19.1kmh in 2007 to 17.8kmh, as ridership went up from 2.9 million per day to 3.45 million per day in the same time." ['Bus hubs currently the priority and good progress made: Josephine Teo': (TDY18Jan2012)], and in fact, transport by bicycle for journeys 30km and up might average 25.750kmh. [source: 'road-bike.co.uk']
Rather than the drawing up of more bus lanes, it seems that the MOT is getting lazy and thus enacting some confusing stop gap measures like the ridiculous mandatory Give Way to Buses Scheme (GWTBS)- a scheme whose logic if not legality remains both contradictory if not perplexing. It is in fact perhaps oxymoronic that the good Minister now says that the slow speed of buses exiting bus is due to the fast and continuous movement of other vehicular traffic on Singapore roads, since in stationary traffic conditions yellow boxes to provide for 'reserved' space so that exiting buses ALWAYS have right of way. [Dunearn-Newton Rd- bus bay with typical yellow box pict].
Wouldn't the provision of better public transport services cause fewer Singaporeans to need to travel by taxi or private car?- a largely carbon intense mode of personal transportation.
Isn't the revolving door [wiki] effect of buses entering bus bays the occasion for buses to exit just the same since a bus awaiting entry to a bus bay effectively blocks off all oncoming traffic by virtue of its size? (that is if Minister Lui is adamant about saving bus-lanes painting costs).
Mr Lui used to be a Rear Admiral in the navy, with a large cannon in front and torpedoes beneath, everyone gave way to the Admiral's ship. But road vehicular traffic is not the same, emergency vehicles get stuck in traffic jams just the same- nobody moves. Everyone needs space on the little land designated for road use: bus lanes besides allowing cyclist free passage (cycling is good for exercise (save govt healthcare costs) and good for the environment (low impact on global warming)) also allow emergency public vehicles free passage to conduct to their rightful roles, even during the heaviest traffic periods on all days. Emergency public vehicles stuck in jams remain a stain upon the efficiency that the PAP boasts its credentials by.
The start stop driving by vehicles on the left lane caused by ambiguity as to whether a bus is indeed leaving the bus bay is also another cause for accidents occurring, if not a compromise in time and energy efficiency as drivers operate their brakes with unnecessary intensity. This adds to pollution if not frustration of driving on Singapore roads; foreign talents holding international driving licenses also cannot be expected to understand this paradoxical local law as it is international convention for vehicles along minor roads (bays etc) to give way to vehicles along major roads (e.g. trunk roads): wouldn't an accident due to this legal paradox result in more jams created by unnecessary traffic accidents?
One side issue would be that the Minister is being unnecessary cruel to cyclist and motorcyclist in the enaction of the GWTBS law is that the poor rider/ pillion is then expected to breath in the diesel fumes of the exiting bus: not a pleasant experience nor a safe one- considering that the car driver behind might not be able to break in time, having not considered about the need to stop to give way to the exiting bus and result in the poor rider being crushed in-between- another tragic road fatality.
Mr Lui's salary is one that mirrors the elite of the elite in Singapore [pict]. Surely being elite is not about just making more money? Don't the people of Singapore demand more than just hare brained stop gap measures in managing public transport and road use in hyper-efficient Singapore?
Not everybody can afford a maid [pict link], nor the privilege of private transportation in Singapore [Saw Phiak Hua empress pict].
More for public transport, more for bicycles... Good Minister, Thank you and have a nice day.
References:
Above: Dunearn-Newton Rd bus bay- yellow box pict. [pict source: Singapore's defense burden - Something no maid can carry][pict source]STOMP 29Aug09: “I gave way to bus -- and got rammed from behind”, [link]
STOMP 19Aug09: “I am one of many 'victims' unfairly fined $130 under new 'give way to bus' rule ”, [link]
[link]
[img source]================
At/ related:
A1:
29Mar2012: Does Mr Lui Tuck Yew think that he can amend the law to suit his convenience as MOT?
HWZ:
29Mar2012: Does Mr Lui Tuck Yew think that he can amend the law to suit his convenience as MOT?
MCF:
29Mar2012: Errors of the Mandatory Give Way to Buses Scheme
SBF:
29Mar2012: Does Mr Lui Tuck Yew think that he can amend the law to suit his convenience as MOT?
SGC:
29Mar2012: Is Mr Lui Tuck Yew crazy to bend the law to suit his convenience as Minister of Transport?
REACH:
29Mar2012: 'Mandatory Give Way to Buses Scheme' is a cruel joke.
SGC:
29Mar2012: Is Mr Lui Tuck Yew crazy to bend the law to suit his convenience as Minister of Transport?
REACH:
29Mar2012: 'Mandatory Give Way to Buses Scheme' is a cruel joke.
29Mar2012: Is Mr Lui Tuck Yew crazy to bend the law to suit his convenience as Minister of Transport?
29Mar2012: Is Mr Lui Tuck Yew crazy to bend the law to suit his convenience as Minister of Transport?
29Mar2012: Is Mr Lui Tuck Yew crazy to bend the law to suit his convenience as Minister of Transport?
No comments:
Post a Comment